Topic summary
⁠64%2 analyzed articles/videos1,778 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Windows 11 Features results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 730 hits. Analysis detected 4,231 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,334 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (10,152 of 16,562 topics). This Windows 11 Features is better (less manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group.
Windows 11 Features
Topic details
Total words: 5,334
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510038.7% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.7%13.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.6%11.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.2%9.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos