Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos522 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House Event results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 954 hits. Analysis detected 7,797 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,512 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (6,559 of 16,562 topics). This White House Event is worse (more manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group.
White House Event
Topic details
Total words: 5,512
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510060.4% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 17.3%17.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.0%17.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Topic 5.3%5.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.2%Tu Quoque: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos