Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video522 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steve Futterman results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Anecdotal, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 291 hits. Analysis detected 2,018 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,583 of 6,382 authors). This Steve Futterman is worse (more manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
Steve Futterman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
76%Steve Futterman (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,088
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

75% percentile
025507510075.2% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 13.9%13.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.8%5.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 4.9%4.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.0%4.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 5.9%5.9%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Author 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 13.9%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Author 9.8%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Author 7.9%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Red Herring: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Primacy Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Nature: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Personal Incredulity: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos