Topic summary
82%2 analyzed articles/videos659 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Water Systems results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 390 hits. Analysis detected 2,539 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,636 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 75% (6,061 of 24,040 topics). This Water Systems is worse (more manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group.
Water Systems
Topic details
Total words: 2,636
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510074.8% percentile
3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 14.8%14.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 10.8%10.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate