Author summary
5%1 analyzed article/video569 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bob Neal results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Loss Aversion, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 2.9% saturation with 67 hits. Analysis detected 399 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 22% (6,955 of 8,818 authors). This Bob Neal is better (less manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group.
Bob Neal
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
22%Bob Neal (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,276
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

21% percentile
025507510021.1% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.3%2.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.6%1.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 1.6%1.6%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos