Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Watch Party Cancellation results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 579 hits. Analysis detected 3,611 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,676 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,769 topics). This Watch Party Cancellation is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Watch Party Cancellation
Topic details
Total words: 3,676
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.5%7.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.6%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos