Topic summary
92% 2 analyzed articles/videos 4,942 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War On Drugs results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 2,101 hits . Analysis detected 15,360 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,144 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (9,478 of 16,562 topics). This War On Drugs is better (less manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group. War On Drugs
Topic details
Total words: 12,144
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.8% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 17.3% 17.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.5% 15.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst