Topic summary
31%2 analyzed articles/videos938 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War Crimes Allegations results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 1,879 hits. Analysis detected 14,360 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,736 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (12,974 of 15,690 topics). This War Crimes Allegations is better (less manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group.
War Crimes Allegations
Topic details
Total words: 18,736
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510017.3% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles18.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos