Topic summary
⁠56%4 analyzed articles/videos4,148 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wages results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 2,055 hits. Analysis detected 15,417 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,067 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (12,472 of 16,562 topics). This Wages is better (less manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group.
Wages
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510024.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles16.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.2%4.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.8%12.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.9%6.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos