KQED61%

SFUSD Teachers Strike Ends After 4 Days With Tentative Deal0%

By Katie DeBenedetti69%

2/13/2026, 8:15:58 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Red Herring, and Anchoring Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 68.3% saturation with 263 hits. Analysis detected 1,040 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,078 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

When I was a student at Arizona State University almost 15 years ago, I helped film a massive event on campus known as the Origins Symposium, a science-focused discussion series led by the well-known physicist Lawrence Krauss and attended by thousands. 
Years later, I’d come to see Krauss’ name all over the Jeffrey Epstein files, in emails showing that he maintained ties to Epstein several years after the latter pleaded guilty to sex crimes. 
For me, that revelation showed the extent of Epstein’s ties to academia and how he used them to maintain influence when he should have been a pariah. 
And the fallout in academia over the Epstein files continues. 
As The New York Times reported earlier this week, some of the recently released files show how Epstein pulled strings behind the scenes in 2012 to get his then-girlfriend admitted to Columbia University’s dental school after she’d been rejected. 
(The revelation raises fresh questions for me about the creepy dentist’s chair Epstein had on his private island.) 
Columbia University fessed up to the special treatment in a statement on Wednesday: 
In short, a student was admitted to the dental school through an irregular process, coinciding with fundraising solicitations by former academic and alumni leadership of the school. 
The fundraising discussions were undertaken by the then leadership of the dental school or individuals acting at their behest and not at the direction of the leadership of the medical center or the University. 
To be clear: the matters discussed in these communications do not meet Columbia’s standards for integrity and independence in admissions. 
Columbia isn’t the only university coming to terms with its ties to Epstein. 
The outlet Inside Higher Ed, for example, listed nine professors and faculty members whose ties to Epstein prompted recent statements from several universities, including Harvard and Yale. 
At Ohio State University, a professor was put on leave for wrestling a documentary filmmaker to the ground after the filmmaker sought to ask the university’s former president about OSU’s Epstein connections. 
The former president, a man named E. Gordon Gee, recently decried efforts to remove billionaire Les Wexner’s name from university buildings because of his close relationship with Epstein  efforts Gee called “cancel culture.” 
Needless to say, the revelations from the Epstein files are sending tremors throughout college and university campuses. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.4%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.5%CalMatters: 1.9%Confirmation Bias11.4%This article: 17.1%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.5%CalMatters: 0.9%Anchoring Bias17.1%This article: 4.7%Katie DeBenedetti: 3.6%CalMatters: 3.0%Availability Heuristic4.7%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.9%CalMatters: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 15.6%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.5%Hindsight Bias15.6%This article: 4.4%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.1%CalMatters: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias4.4%This article: 42.6%Katie DeBenedetti: 8.9%CalMatters: 6.3%Framing Effect42.6%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.0%CalMatters: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.7%CalMatters: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 4.0%CalMatters: 3.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.6%CalMatters: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 68.3%Katie DeBenedetti: 8.9%CalMatters: 6.4%Negativity Bias68.3%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.6%CalMatters: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.1%CalMatters: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 8.8%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias8.8%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.8%CalMatters: 2.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.5%CalMatters: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 8.8%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.3%CalMatters: 0.6%Ad Hominem8.8%This article: 8.8%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.2%Straw Man8.8%This article: 17.1%Katie DeBenedetti: 3.5%CalMatters: 3.1%Appeal to Authority17.1%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.3%CalMatters: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.1%CalMatters: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.4%Katie DeBenedetti: 3.7%CalMatters: 3.6%Hasty Generalization11.4%This article: 21.8%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.2%Red Herring21.8%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.1%Katie DeBenedetti: 9.1%CalMatters: 5.3%Appeal to Emotion9.1%This article: 7.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.0%CalMatters: 0.6%Begging the Question7.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.2%CalMatters: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 13.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.5%CalMatters: 3.1%Anecdotal13.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.5%CalMatters: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.7%CalMatters: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.6%CalMatters: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

385 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.