Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos3,059 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health Care Benefits results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 37.5% saturation with 2,916 hits. Analysis detected 12,865 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,780 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (5,607 of 16,562 topics). This Health Care Benefits is worse (more manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
Health Care Benefits
Topic details
Total words: 7,780
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510066.1% percentile
3.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 37.5%37.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 20.5%20.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 8.4%8.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.4%9.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 37.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 4.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos