Keyword summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 5,189 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Francisco Unified School District results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 3,634 hits . Analysis detected 20,675 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,265 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (17,536 of 37,536 keywords). This San Francisco Unified School District is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group. San Francisco Unified School District
Keyword details
Total words: 15,265
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.3% percentile 3.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles15.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 23.8% 23.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 23.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst