Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,078 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sfusd Contract results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 31.9% saturation with 810 hits. Analysis detected 4,502 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,541 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (3,535 of 16,562 topics). This Sfusd Contract is worse (more manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group.
Sfusd Contract
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,541
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510078.7% percentile
5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 11.7%11.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.9%13.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 11.9%11.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 31.9%31.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 8.8%8.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 31.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 4.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos