Topic summary
⁠29%5 analyzed articles/videos3,776 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vpns results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Overconfidence Bias, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 2,111 hits. Analysis detected 12,812 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,457 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,165 of 15,759 topics). This Vpns is better (less manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group.
Vpns
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 12,457
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 16.9%16.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos