Topic summary
29% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,469 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Voter Eligibility results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Ad Hominem , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 1,384 hits . Analysis detected 8,581 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,971 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 38% (10,272 of 16,562 topics). This Voter Eligibility is better (less manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group. Voter Eligibility
Topic details
Total words: 8,971
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.0% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.0% 12.0% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.4% 15.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Horn Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst