Topic summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video861 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Veteran Readjustment results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Circular Reasoning, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 277 hits. Analysis detected 2,418 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,583 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,798 of 16,562 topics). This Veteran Readjustment is worse (more manipulative) than 52.90% of the peer group.
Veteran Readjustment
Topic details
Total words: 2,583
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510052.9% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.4%10.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.7%10.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Circular Reasoning: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos