Author summary
62% 1 analyzed article/video 861 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ezenwa E. Olumba Ph.D. results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Circular Reasoning , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 277 hits . Analysis detected 2,418 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,583 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,437 of 6,364 authors). This Ezenwa E. Olumba Ph.D. is worse (more manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group. Ezenwa E. Olumba Ph.D.
Author details
Total words: 2,583
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.7% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.7% 10.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Circular Reasoning: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst