Topic summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video676 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vermont Green Fc Women's Team results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 27.8% saturation with 564 hits. Analysis detected 1,836 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,028 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,702 of 16,562 topics). This Vermont Green Fc Women's Team is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
Vermont Green Fc Women's Team
Topic details
Total words: 2,028
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510059.5% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 27.8%27.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Topic 27.8%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos