Topic summary
83%1 analyzed article/video882 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vermont Economy results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 515 hits. Analysis detected 3,573 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,646 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 67% (5,533 of 16,562 topics). This Vermont Economy is worse (more manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group.
Vermont Economy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,646
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510066.6% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.5%19.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.9%13.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.7%8.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.7%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos