Topic summary
ā 66% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,145 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vehicle Recalls results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Anchoring Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24% saturation with 1,352 hits . Analysis detected 6,902 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,629 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ā 52% (7,959 of 16,562 topics). This Vehicle Recalls is worse (more manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group. Vehicle Recalls
Topic details
Total words: 5,629
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.9% percentile 3.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 16.0% 16.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 24.0% 24.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 24.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 4.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Red Herring: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst