Topic summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video292 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vance's Political Future results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hindsight Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 46.8% saturation with 410 hits. Analysis detected 2,297 faulty-reasoning hits from 876 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,532 of 16,562 topics). This Vance's Political Future is worse (more manipulative) than 90.80% of the peer group.
Vance's Political Future
Topic details
Total words: 876
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510090.8% percentile
9.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles876 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 46.8%46.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 40.4%40.4%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 16.9%16.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.4%14.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 10.8%10.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 10.5%10.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 14.4%14.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.1%10.1%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 46.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 40.4%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 26.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 10.8%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.1%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Bandwagon: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.0%No True Scotsman: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos