Author summary
100%1 analyzed article/video292 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rod Dreher results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hindsight Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 46.8% saturation with 410 hits. Analysis detected 2,297 faulty-reasoning hits from 876 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9% and a BS Rank of 94% (413 of 6,508 authors). This Rod Dreher is worse (more manipulative) than 93.70% of the peer group.
Rod Dreher
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
94%Rod Dreher (selected)10%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 876
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

94% percentile
025507510093.7% percentile
9.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles876 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 46.8%46.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 40.4%40.4%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 16.9%16.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.4%14.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 10.8%10.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 10.5%10.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 10.4%10.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 14.4%14.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 10.1%10.1%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Author 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 46.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 40.4%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Author 14.4%, sitewide 26.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 16.9%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 14.4%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 10.8%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Author 10.5%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 10.1%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Bandwagon: Author 8.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.0%No True Scotsman: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos