Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video734 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vaccine Mandates results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, False Dilemma, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 447 hits. Analysis detected 2,099 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,936 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (8,261 of 16,562 topics). This Vaccine Mandates is worse (more manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group.
Vaccine Mandates
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,936
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510050.1% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.2%15.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.0%7.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos