Topic summary
⁠31%3 analyzed articles/videos1,008 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vaccination Policy results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 1,247 hits. Analysis detected 7,731 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,411 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (12,384 of 15,753 topics). This Vaccination Policy is better (less manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group.
Vaccination Policy
Topic details
Total words: 9,411
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510021.4% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.3%13.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Straw Man: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos