Topic summary
⁠47%3 analyzed articles/videos1,677 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utility Rates results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 875 hits. Analysis detected 5,618 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,622 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,284 of 15,920 topics). This Utility Rates is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
Utility Rates
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,622
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.4% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.6%15.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 10.5%10.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Special Pleading: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos