Topic summary
78%2 analyzed articles/videos1,172 analyzed words
BS Summary: These User Interface Design results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Overconfidence Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.8% saturation with 1,138 hits. Analysis detected 6,270 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,248 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 64% (5,962 of 16,562 topics). This User Interface Design is worse (more manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group.
User Interface Design
Topic details
Total words: 4,248
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510064.0% percentile
3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 26.8%26.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 13.2%13.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.8%14.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 8.5%8.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 26.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate