Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video821 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Presidential Libraries results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 559 hits. Analysis detected 4,765 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,284 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 74% (4,387 of 16,562 topics). This Us Presidential Libraries is worse (more manipulative) than 73.50% of the peer group.
Us Presidential Libraries
Topic details
Total words: 3,284
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510073.5% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 15.5%15.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 17.0%17.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos