Topic summary
60%7 analyzed articles/videos10,800 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Presidency results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 6,545 hits. Analysis detected 42,042 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,028 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (13,106 of 16,559 topics). This Us Presidency is better (less manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group.
Us Presidency

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510020.9% percentile
1.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles41K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.9%15.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.3%14.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate