Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These US Military Casualties results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 219 hits. Analysis detected 718 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,188 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,558 topics). This US Military Casualties is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
US Military Casualties
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%US Military Casualties (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 1,188
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 12.3%12.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.3%3.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 2.4%2.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 18.4%18.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 19.2%Recency Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos