Topic summary
⁠51%3 analyzed articles/videos1,109 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Italy Relations results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 2,356 hits. Analysis detected 15,319 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,146 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (11,245 of 16,559 topics). This US Italy Relations is better (less manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group.
US Italy Relations
Topic details
Total words: 15,146
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510032.1% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles15.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.6%15.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.8%12.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos