Author summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,321 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sasha Abramsky results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 47.7% saturation with 4,428 hits. Analysis detected 18,520 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,284 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (1,067 of 6,529 authors). This Sasha Abramsky is worse (more manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group.
Sasha Abramsky
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠84%Sasha Abramsky (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,284
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

84% percentile
025507510083.7% percentile
5.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 47.7%47.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 22.0%22.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 17.4%17.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 8.4%8.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 6.2%6.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Author 47.7%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 22.2%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Author 22.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 17.4%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 13.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery Slope: Author 8.4%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Author 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Horn Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos