Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video600 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Israel Alliance results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and False Dilemma, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 205 hits. Analysis detected 2,083 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,111 of 16,562 topics). This US Israel Alliance is worse (more manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
US Israel Alliance
Topic details
Total words: 2,400
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.1% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.5%6.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.7%7.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.7%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos