Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These US China Tech Relations results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 604 hits. Analysis detected 5,890 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,843 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This US China Tech Relations is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
US China Tech Relations
Topic details
Total words: 3,843
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.8%11.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.7%15.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.0%15.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos