Topic summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,695 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Air Force results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 944 hits . Analysis detected 10,941 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,512 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (14,342 of 15,373 topics). This Us Air Force is better (less manipulative) than 93.30% of the peer group. Us Air Force
Topic details
Total words: 16,512
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.7% percentile 1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles16.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst