Topic summary
⁠75%2 analyzed articles/videos2,875 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Urban Landmarks results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.5% saturation with 2,196 hits. Analysis detected 10,562 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,625 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (8,494 of 15,527 topics). This Urban Landmarks is better (less manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group.
Urban Landmarks
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,625
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510045.3% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 25.5%25.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.6%11.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.5%4.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 25.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos