Author summary
81%2 analyzed articles/videos880 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lee Bey results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 618 hits. Analysis detected 3,669 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,990 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,373 of 6,362 authors). This Lee Bey is worse (more manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group.
Lee Bey
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
63%Lee Bey (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,990
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

63% percentile
025507510062.7% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.5%6.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 15.5%15.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.2%9.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Special Pleading: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos