Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 4,928 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julissa James results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 3,868 hits . Analysis detected 16,472 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,717 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 34% (4,058 of 6,137 authors). This Julissa James is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group. Julissa James
Author details
Total words: 17,717
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.9% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles17.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 21.8% 21.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 15.2% 15.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.8%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 15.2%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst