Topic summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video532 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Urban Health Issues results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 130 hits. Analysis detected 744 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,596 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (6,112 of 15,608 topics). This Urban Health Issues is worse (more manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group.
Urban Health Issues
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠61%Urban Health Issues (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,596
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510060.8% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.4%3.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 1.7%1.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 8.2%8.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos