Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Urban Congestion results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 321 hits. Analysis detected 2,454 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,778 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Urban Congestion is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Urban Congestion
Topic details
Total words: 2,778
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.6%11.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.4%4.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.5%3.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.9%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Special Pleading: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos