Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,258 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Upstate results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Anecdotal, and Ad Hominem, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 327 hits. Analysis detected 3,658 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,032 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (11,963 of 16,562 topics). This Upstate is better (less manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.
Upstate
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,032
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510027.8% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.9%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos