Topic summary
⁠4%1 analyzed article/video79 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University President results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 22 hits. Analysis detected 98 faulty-reasoning hits from 237 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (3,067 of 16,558 topics). This University President is worse (more manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group.
University President
Topic details
Total words: 237
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510081.5% percentile
5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles237 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos