St. Thomas University president placed on leave amid investigation into alleged misconduct - WSVN 7News | Miami News, Weather, Sports | Fort Lauderdale 8%

By Litzy Grijalba4%

7/23/2026, 10:28:13 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.8% saturation with 22 hits. Analysis detected 98 faulty-reasoning hits from 79 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 24.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (19,570 of 21,176 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 92.40% of the article peer group.

MIAMI GARDENS, FLA. 
(WSVN) - The president of St. 
Thomas University in Miami Gardens has been placed on leave amid an ongoing investigation. 
Officials said David Armstrong is facing allegations of conduct that violates university policy. 
He’s been placed on leave pending the results of the investigation. 
Armstrong has been president at the university since 2018. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.5%Litzy Grijalba: 5.5%WSVN: 2.8%Confirmation Bias16.5%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 3.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 17.7%Litzy Grijalba: 5.9%WSVN: 7.0%Framing Effect17.7%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 2.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 2.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 27.8%Litzy Grijalba: 9.3%WSVN: 12.5%Negativity Bias27.8%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.4%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 1.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 1.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 11.4%Litzy Grijalba: 3.8%WSVN: 0.1%Primacy Effect11.4%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 16.5%Litzy Grijalba: 5.5%WSVN: 4.1%Appeal to Authority16.5%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 2.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 17.7%Litzy Grijalba: 5.9%WSVN: 2.5%Hasty Generalization17.7%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 5.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 16.5%Litzy Grijalba: 5.5%WSVN: 2.2%Unattributed Quote16.5%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 4.0%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

79 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.