Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,323 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University Life results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 414 hits . Analysis detected 1,812 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,969 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (9,884 of 16,562 topics). This University Life is better (less manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group. University Life
Topic details
Total words: 3,969
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.3% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.7% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst