Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video393 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Venezuela Tensions results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 53.2% saturation with 627 hits. Analysis detected 3,493 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,179 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (809 of 16,562 topics). This U S Venezuela Tensions is worse (more manipulative) than 95.10% of the peer group.
U S Venezuela Tensions
Topic details
Total words: 1,179
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

95% percentile
025507510095.1% percentile
12.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 53.2%53.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 33.0%33.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 33.2%33.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 23.7%23.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 14.2%14.2%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 12.8%12.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 10.9%10.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 28.4%28.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 12.7%12.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 53.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 33.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 33.0%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 28.4%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 23.7%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.5%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.9%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos