Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Southern Command results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 34% saturation with 662 hits. Analysis detected 3,027 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,949 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (3,263 of 15,413 topics). This U S Southern Command is worse (more manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group.
U S Southern Command
Topic details
Total words: 1,949
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510078.8% percentile
5.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 20.8%20.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 15.2%15.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 34.0%34.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.2%13.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 7.8%7.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 34.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 3.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos