Topic summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,234 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Military Strikes results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 39.6% saturation with 1,466 hits. Analysis detected 10,137 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,702 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.8% and a BS Rank of 90% (1,575 of 15,780 topics). This U S Military Strikes is worse (more manipulative) than 90.00% of the peer group.
U S Military Strikes
Topic details
Total words: 3,702
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510090.0% percentile
8.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 39.6%39.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 21.2%21.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 15.3%15.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 27.6%27.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 14.7%14.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 19.2%19.2%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 7.5%7.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 8.9%8.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.5%13.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 32.6%32.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 39.6%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 32.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 27.6%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 19.2%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 3.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Tu Quoque: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos