Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,234 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Military Strikes results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 39.6% saturation with 1,466 hits . Analysis detected 10,137 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,702 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.8% and a BS Rank of 90% (1,575 of 15,780 topics). This U S Military Strikes is worse (more manipulative) than 90.00% of the peer group. U S Military Strikes
Topic details
Total words: 3,702
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.0% percentile 8.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 39.6% 39.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 21.2% 21.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 15.3% 15.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 27.6% 27.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 14.7% 14.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 19.2% 19.2% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 13.5% 13.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 32.6% 32.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 39.6%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 32.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 27.6%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 19.2%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 3.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 9.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.9% Straw Man: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.9% Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Tu Quoque: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst