Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,261 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Iran Conflict results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 890 hits. Analysis detected 5,042 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,044 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (8,962 of 16,558 topics). This U S Iran Conflict is better (less manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
U S Iran Conflict
Topic details
Total words: 5,044
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.9% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.3%4.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos