Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,751 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Defense And Military Politics results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 764 hits. Analysis detected 5,079 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,550 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (11,134 of 15,414 topics). This U S Defense And Military Politics is better (less manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.
U S Defense And Military Politics
Topic details
Total words: 6,550
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510027.8% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.7%11.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos