Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,816 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tyler Robinson results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 1,010 hits. Analysis detected 7,776 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,412 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,041 of 15,447 topics). This Tyler Robinson is worse (more manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group.
Tyler Robinson
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,412
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510067.4% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.4%11.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 6.8%6.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.1%13.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.2%11.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.2%4.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 0.4%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos