Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 998 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tsunami Warning results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 548 hits . Analysis detected 2,341 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,992 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 53% (7,894 of 16,562 topics). This Tsunami Warning is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group. Tsunami Warning
Topic details
Total words: 3,992
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.3% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 13.7% 13.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst